A couple of months ago I switched jobs and went from a product-centric, sales driven environment to a project-centric, tech-driven environment. Needless to say, this was a bit of an adjustment for me, despite the fact I did project-centric work for over 6 years.
You see, most frontends require a well thought-through REST API in order to be able to deliver functionality quickly. And just like I’ve learned a lot about things like AngularJS, I’ve learned how good RESTful API actually look like. This also was a big eye-opener for me. Most of us see concepts like HATEOAS as a fine addition on good RESTful APIs. Even I thought this was something that was separate from developing an actual RESTful API. However, I was wrong. A concept like HATEOAS is at the core of a good RESTful API and should be a prime concern whenever one starts to develop such an API.
There are many ways to implement a self-discovering API using REST. There’s HAL, JSON-LD, Collection+JSON and SIREN. Professionally I’m now using SIREN and after experimenting with the other approaches I can see why my company has chosen it. It’s easy, feature-packed and quick to implement in Java (which is a big plus for me).
But a tool is just a tool and it’s still easy to create awful RESTful APIs using SIREN. I’ve made this mistake in the past. RESTful APIs need to have clear boundaries and need to be given great thought. Most of us start developing it and make it grow organically as the need arises. This is the wrong approach. Like in DDD, you need to know what your domain looks like and model your APIs accordingly. In brown-field development, a REST API is something that is created as an add-on and tends to choose the path of least resistance, especially if the originating code it uses does not adhere to DDD standards (like mixed bounded contexts). The result is a mess and I’m not proud to say I’ve made my share of bad RESTful APIs because I didn’t adhere to that prerequisite.
This is why I’m currently devoting most of my time researching how to create good RESTful APIs. It also means I’m brushing up on my DDD knowledge, because I see the two seriously intertwined. I’ve come to the point that I realize that when you develop a RESTful API, you shouldn’t even look at the existing system. You should look at the domain and work from there, identifying the links and actions needed to navigate the domain. Making a RESTful API built with a good domain talk to an existing backend is easy. Fixing a bad RESTful API because you worked bottom-up is not.Tweet this article